Location

Dolan School of Business

Start Date

29-5-2014 1:15 PM

End Date

29-5-2014 2:15 PM

Session Type

Roundtable Discussion

Description

Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTL) have become important arenas of faculty development in teaching and scholarship on many campuses, educating and supporting faculty to become more expert in all aspects of teaching, and to become scholars of teaching and learning. We analyzed our CTL activity to discern how it fits a model for integrated mentoring within a community of practice (Smith, Calderwood, Dohm & Gill Lopez, (2013), the situated context for faculty work and for faculty development activity. The center facilitated dyadic, network and co-mentoring activity across its offerings, infused throughout the 3 conceptual models of faculty work predominant on our campus, with network building and co-mentoring relationships predominating. This study adds the notion of mentoring leadership to Smith et al.’s structural-functional model. Implications for CTL’s are that mentoring within a Community of Practice Framework is appealing and empowering to faculty and professional staff, economically sound and organizationally sustainable.

Topic Designation

Mentoring

Presenter Bio(s)

Patricia Calderwood
Professor of Educational Studies and Teacher Preparation
Fairfield University

Suzanna Klaf
Associate Director of the Center for Academic Excellence
Fairfield University

Share

COinS
 
May 29th, 1:15 PM May 29th, 2:15 PM

CTL as Community of Practice for Mentoring: A Case Study

Dolan School of Business

Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTL) have become important arenas of faculty development in teaching and scholarship on many campuses, educating and supporting faculty to become more expert in all aspects of teaching, and to become scholars of teaching and learning. We analyzed our CTL activity to discern how it fits a model for integrated mentoring within a community of practice (Smith, Calderwood, Dohm & Gill Lopez, (2013), the situated context for faculty work and for faculty development activity. The center facilitated dyadic, network and co-mentoring activity across its offerings, infused throughout the 3 conceptual models of faculty work predominant on our campus, with network building and co-mentoring relationships predominating. This study adds the notion of mentoring leadership to Smith et al.’s structural-functional model. Implications for CTL’s are that mentoring within a Community of Practice Framework is appealing and empowering to faculty and professional staff, economically sound and organizationally sustainable.