Document Type
Article
Article Version
Post-print
Publication Date
2000
Abstract
Knowledge of the occurrence and detection of errors in accounting populations is of great importance to auditors in assessing risks, evaluating the efficacy of statistical sampling methods, and planning effective and efficient audit procedures to address risks. A significant body of research exists that examines these issues. Prior studies have focused primarily on auditordetected errors. A basic assumption of these studies is that detected errors are an accurate reflection of all significant errors present. That is, there are not a substantial number of undetected errors, or that undetected errors share the same characteristics (e.g., error direction) as detected errors. However, little evidence exists regarding the accuracy of this assumption. Further, there has been little consideration of factors that may affect differences between detected and actual errors and the implications of these differences on research conclusions.
This paper presents a model of the variables involved in the error generation and error detection processes. Variables that have been explored in prior research are discussed along with those requiring further investigation. Finally, the paper identifies confounding variables to be controlled in future studies and makes suggestions for improving extant error study methods.
Publication Title
Journal of Accounting Literature
Repository Citation
Caster, Paul; Massey, Dawn W.; and Wright, Arnold, "Research on the Nature, Characteristics, and Causes of Accounting Errors: The Need For a Multi-method Approach" (2000). Business Faculty Publications. 133.
https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/business-facultypubs/133
Published Citation
Caster, Paul, Dawn Massey and Arnold Wright. "Research on the Nature, Characteristics, and Causes of Accounting Errors: The Need For a Multi-method Approach" Journal of Accounting Literature, 19 (2000), pp.60 – 92.
Comments
Copyright 2000 Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in The Journal of Accounting Literature. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 19, 2000.