Methodological choices in Kelsey's eccentric existence

Document Type


Publication Date



This article explores the methodological choices that shape David Kelsey's magnum opus Eccentric Existence: A Theological Anthropology (2009). These choices are explicit, and elucidated by Kelsey primarily in the introductory sections of this work. Considered in turn are Kelsey's rejection of a modern, apologetical approach to the theological task, his recovery of a premodern commitment to explaining the logic of beliefs rather than the logic of coming to belief, his explication of theological anthropology through a God-centered, Trinitarian, understanding of the biblical plot, and his decision to elucidate the human person theologically through an appreciation of the canonical Wisdom literature, which valorizes humanity's created goodness. It concludes by assessing Kelsey's project as an unsystematic systematic theology, a notion he develops as well in his earlier Imagining Redemption (2005).


Copyright 2010 Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

A link to full text has been provided for authorized users.

Publication Title

Modern Theology

Published Citation

Thiel, John E. "Methodological choices in Kelsey's eccentric existence." Modern Theology vol.27, no.1, 2011, pp.1-13. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01650.x.



Peer Reviewed